Why was Rule utilitarianism developed?

Why was Rule utilitarianism developed?

Jean Claude
Newbie

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Jun 03, 2013

Total Topics: 1
Total Posts: 1
#1 - Quote - Permalink
Posted Jun 4, 2013 - 12:00 AM:
Subject: Why was Rule utilitarianism developed?
Hey guys, first post.

I'm studying philosophy at Uni and we're on the topic of utilitarianism and specifically act vs rule. A tutor posed a question about why was rule utilitarianism developed and I'm unsure on the exact reason why.

Was it to criticize Bentham's theory? Does anyone know?
shmik
PF Addict
Avatar

Usergroup: Sponsors
Joined: Jun 29, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Total Topics: 38
Total Posts: 1201
Avatar shmik
#2 - Quote - Permalink
1 of 1 people found this post helpful
Posted Jun 4, 2013 - 12:36 AM:

Welcome to the forums.
JC wrote:
I'm studying philosophy at Uni and we're on the topic of utilitarianism and specifically act vs rule. A tutor posed a question about why was rule utilitarianism developed and I'm unsure on the exact reason why.

In short: its because humans are not good at predicting consequences.

Rule utilitarianism is the view that if we create rules which can be used rather than analyzing each act individually it will actually lead to greater maximization of the good. This is because if an individual analyses each particular act, he will get things wrong too often. Both rule and act utilitarianism want the greatest maximization, the thing that differentiates them is their views on the best method to achieve it.
If humans could predict the outcome of an action perfectly than rule utilitarianism would not exist.
bert1
Secular Hindu
Avatar

Usergroup: Sponsors
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
Location: Forres, Scotland

Total Topics: 98
Total Posts: 2252
Avatar bert1
#3 - Quote - Permalink
Posted Jun 4, 2013 - 4:20 AM:

What shmik said. Act utilitarianism is 'dangerous in the hands of fools.' (Charlton)
This inactive thread has been archived. To continue the topic, start a new one.
Download thread as
  • 0/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5



This thread is closed, so you cannot post a reply.