Self-referential sentences: Philosophy Forums

Philosophy Forums » Philosophy of Language » Self-referential sentences » Self-referential sentences

Self-referential sentences

Self-referential sentences

jsidelko
Professor

Usergroup: Sponsors
Joined: Jun 08, 2009

Total Topics: 48
Total Posts: 524

Posted 10/26/09 - 05:44 PM:
Subject: Self-referential sentences

Self-referential sentences

“This sentence is false.” is considered to be an example of a self-referential sentence. However, such a sentence may not necessarily be referring to itself. It could be referring to a different sentence. Suppose the sentence was referring to an unstated sentence rather than itself. For example, if I were to point at a sentence from a list and state: “This sentence is false.”, I would not be making a self-referential statement that is both true and false. There is insufficient information to positively state that certain sentences are actually self-referential.WIthout such information are we justified in making such a claim.

thanatos

Arkady
Professor

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Jul 29, 2009

Total Topics: 19
Total Posts: 785

Posted 10/26/09 - 05:54 PM:	#2
This sentence is a sentence.
"The sleep of reason produces monsters." -Francisco Goya

Timothy
Procrastinator

Usergroup: Moderators
Joined: Dec 18, 2004
Location: Grad School

Total Topics: 90
Total Posts: 2257

Posted 10/26/09 - 07:19 PM:	#3
I guess theoreticians focus on the interesting case where "this sentence is false" yields paradox...
- Shouldn't you be working on your thesis? - If I should, then procrastination never felt so good Mike Slackenerny

Dragohunter
illusion is persistent

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Jan 08, 2009
Location: Why does it matteR?

Total Topics: 9
Total Posts: 266

Posted 10/27/09 - 09:24 AM:	#4
I posted a similar topic: http://forums.philosophyforums.com...ent-is-a-lie----32868.html though your sentence is questioning the truth values of a sentence rather than the meaning of what the person is implying. But I can't say the sentence is truly "self-referenctial" in the rigorous sense because the sentence is being used by a person to refer to something else, or intentionally giving a direction of fit to the world. Another explanation is that the sentence itself does not really contradict each other at all. For an example, the statement "It is true that two plus two equals four" contains no more information than the statement "two plus two equals four," because the phrase "it is true that..." is always implicitly there. And in the self-referential illusion, the phrase "it is true that..." is equivalent to "this whole statement is true and ...". It is a simple contradiction of the form "A and not A", and so it's false.
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal." - Albert Einstein Influences: Ludwig Wittgenstein, C.S. Peirce, Soren Kierkegaard, John Searle, Socrates, Bertrand Russell, Jesus, Karl Popper, David Hume, John Locke, Bernard Williams, Friedrich Nietzsche, Richard Feynman, Albert Einstein, Brian Greene

xzJoel
Tenured Poster

Usergroup: Sponsors
Joined: Aug 30, 2005
Location: New Jersey

Total Topics: 36
Total Posts: 1017

Posted 10/27/09 - 01:27 PM:	#5
Would you prefer "the sentence you are now reading is false."? Is your issue merely that "this" is ambiguous when it stands without a context? Doesn't ordinary usage lend itself to the idea that an unspecified "this" refers to the thing most obviously present? "This is going to hurt." "This is my first time here." "This sentence is six words long." "This is stupid." What is your criteria for justification? If I define "this" such that the "this" in "this sentence is false" is self referential, am I justified in saying that it is self referential?
"For there is such a distance between how one lives and how one ought to live, that anyone who abandons what is done for what ought to be done achieves his downfall rather than his preservation." Niccolo Machiavelli, "The Prince", Chapter XV.

Schlitz
Hulkamaniac

Usergroup: Moderators
Joined: Feb 09, 2009
Location: Home of the Cougar, Illinois

Total Topics: 5
Total Posts: 270

Posted 10/28/09 - 11:06 PM:	#6
Self-reference isn't a big deal in its own right. There are many trivial but true self-referential sentences: "This sentence is in English," "This sentence features the word 'sentence'," "This sentence has 22 letters," and false self-referential sentences: "This sentence is in German," This sentence does not feature the word 'sentence,' "This sentence has 0 letters," and so on. Self-referential sentences get juicy only when you start using "is true" in them. Check this out for more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liar_paradox

Cadrache
Tenured Poster

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Dec 09, 2006
Location: AB, Canada

Total Topics: 106
Total Posts: 2822

Posted 10/29/09 - 04:02 PM:	#7
The determination of whether or not a sentence is a fragment trumps self-referentiality.
Words the wiser become the name you do not know. - Some guy with a surname Blanchard. _____________________________________________ Truth is want. - The internal state of matters. Truth is Need. - The external state of affairs.

Hanover
The Highest Rank Possible

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Nov 30, 2008
Location: Atlanta

Total Topics: 9
Total Posts: 1137

Posted 10/29/09 - 04:53 PM:	#8
The sentence is self-referential only if you begin with the understanding that you are not communicating other facts outside of the actual sentence itself. If you're speaking a sentence and pointing here and there and changing your inflection, then you may be able to make any sentence mean almost anything. When I say, "this sentence is false," I'm pointing emphatically to my calculator at the word "sentence," clearly indicating that I mean "calculator" when I say "sentence." What's confusing is that I don't know what it means for a calculator to be false, but from my tone, I am absolutely certain of it.
"Nothing is impossible for the man who will not listen to reason." John Belushi, "Animal House" "I have opinions of my own --strong opinions-- but I don't always agree with them." G.W. Bush

Sorry, you don't have permission to post. Log in, or register if you haven't yet.