Philosophy Forums


Self-referential sentences

PrintPrint


Self-referential sentences
jsidelko
Assistant Professor
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Jun 08, 2009

Total Topics: 30
Total Posts: 268
Posted 10/26/09 - 05:44 PM:
Subject: Self-referential sentences
quote post
#1

Self-referential sentences


“This sentence is false.” is considered to be an example of a self-referential sentence. However, such a sentence may not necessarily be referring to itself. It could be referring to a different sentence. Suppose the sentence was referring to an unstated sentence rather than itself. For example, if I were to point at a sentence from a list and state: “This sentence is false.”, I would not be making a self-referential statement that is both true and false. There is insufficient information to positively state that certain sentences are actually self-referential.WIthout such information are we justified in making such a claim.


thanatos
Arkady
Assistant Professor
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Jul 29, 2009

Total Topics: 16
Total Posts: 441
Posted 10/26/09 - 05:54 PM:
quote post
#2
This sentence is a sentence.

"Sit down before fact like a little child, and be prepared to give up every preconceived notion. Follow humbly wherever and to whatever abyss Nature leads, or you shall learn nothing."
-T.H. Huxley
Timothy
Undead Mariachi
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Dec 18, 2004
Location: 04°34'N 74°00'W

Total Topics: 83
Total Posts: 2078
Posted 10/26/09 - 07:19 PM:
quote post
#3
I guess theoreticians focus on the interesting case where "this sentence is false" yields paradox... raised eyebrow

"Neither Aristotelian nor Russellian rules give the exact logic of any expression of ordinary language; for ordinary language has no exact logic." P.F. Strawson
Dragohunter
illusion is persistent
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Jan 08, 2009
Location: Why does it matteR?

Total Topics: 6
Total Posts: 164
Posted 10/27/09 - 09:24 AM:
quote post
#4
I posted a similar topic:
http://forums.philosophyforums.com...ent-is-a-lie----32868.html
though your sentence is questioning the truth values of a sentence rather than the meaning of what the person is implying. But I can't say the sentence is truly "self-referenctial" in the rigorous sense because the sentence is being used by a person to refer to something else, or intentionally giving a direction of fit to the world. Another explanation is that the sentence itself does not really contradict each other at all. For an example, the statement "It is true that two plus two equals four" contains no more information than the statement "two plus two equals four," because the phrase "it is true that..." is always implicitly there. And in the self-referential illusion, the phrase "it is true that..." is equivalent to "this whole statement is true and ...". It is a simple contradiction of the form "A and not A", and so it's false.

"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal." - Albert Einstein
xzJoel
Bio-clump

Usergroup: Sponsors
Joined: Aug 30, 2005
Location: New Jersey

Total Topics: 32
Total Posts: 842
Posted 10/27/09 - 01:27 PM:
quote post
#5
Would you prefer "the sentence you are now reading is false."?

Is your issue merely that "this" is ambiguous when it stands without a context?

Doesn't ordinary usage lend itself to the idea that an unspecified "this" refers to the thing most obviously present?

"This is going to hurt."
"This is my first time here."
"This sentence is six words long."
"This is stupid."

What is your criteria for justification? If I define "this" such that the "this" in "this sentence is false" is self referential, am I justified in saying that it is self referential?


Make a joyous noise onto the lord... Not a good one, just a joyous one.
Schlitz
Hulkamaniac
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Feb 09, 2009
Location: Home of the Cougar, Illinois

Total Topics: 3
Total Posts: 232
Posted 10/28/09 - 11:06 PM:
quote post
#6
Self-reference isn't a big deal in its own right. There are many trivial but true self-referential sentences: "This sentence is in English," "This sentence features the word 'sentence'," "This sentence has 22 letters," and false self-referential sentences: "This sentence is in German," This sentence does not feature the word 'sentence,' "This sentence has 0 letters," and so on. Self-referential sentences get juicy only when you start using "is true" in them. Check this out for more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liar_paradox
Cadrache
Tenured Poster

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Dec 09, 2006
Location: AB, Canada

Total Topics: 104
Total Posts: 2644
Posted 10/29/09 - 04:02 PM:
quote post
#7
The determination of whether or not a sentence is a fragment trumps self-referentiality.

"...There was a writer who asked why it was that when we find positive experiences we say that only the physical facts are real, but in negative experiences we believe that reality is subjective. He made an example of those who say that in birth only the pain is real, the joy a subjective point of view, but that in death it is the emotional loss that is the reality." - Tony Ballantyne, Recursion.
_____________________________________________

Truth is want. - The internal state of matters.

Truth is Need. - The external state of affairs.
Hanover
The Highest Rank Possible
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Nov 30, 2008
Location: Atlanta

Total Topics: 8
Total Posts: 919
Posted 10/29/09 - 04:53 PM:
quote post
#8
The sentence is self-referential only if you begin with the understanding that you are not communicating other facts outside of the actual sentence itself. If you're speaking a sentence and pointing here and there and changing your inflection, then you may be able to make any sentence mean almost anything. When I say, "this sentence is false," I'm pointing emphatically to my calculator at the word "sentence," clearly indicating that I mean "calculator" when I say "sentence." What's confusing is that I don't know what it means for a calculator to be false, but from my tone, I am absolutely certain of it.

"Nothing is impossible for the man who will not listen to reason." John Belushi, "Animal House"
"I have opinions of my own --strong opinions-- but I don't always agree with them." G.W. Bush

Download thread as


Sorry, you don't have permission to post. Log in, or register if you haven't yet.