Philosophy Forums


Negative Numbers

PrintPrint


Page: 1 2 3

Negative Numbers
Banno
Old goat
Avatar

Usergroup: Sponsors
Joined: Aug 15, 2004
Location: Oz

Total Topics: 111
Total Posts: 6303
Posted 10/23/09 - 01:55 PM:
quote post
#11
Yes, that's it!


Davidson: We make maximum sense of the words and thoughts of others when we interpret in a way that optimizes agreement.
Russel Morris: There's a meaning there, but the meaning there doesn't really mean a thing...
Ned: Such is life
Cadrache
Tenured Poster

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Dec 09, 2006
Location: AB, Canada

Total Topics: 104
Total Posts: 2644
Posted 10/23/09 - 02:57 PM:
quote post
#12
I always liked the ideology of quantatative locationality.

- 7 should read as "At the point of 0 on our number line, we are missing an additional 7 quantities."


It only gets complicated when at a specific location X - you end up with more quantities then what you are missing from 0.

"...There was a writer who asked why it was that when we find positive experiences we say that only the physical facts are real, but in negative experiences we believe that reality is subjective. He made an example of those who say that in birth only the pain is real, the joy a subjective point of view, but that in death it is the emotional loss that is the reality." - Tony Ballantyne, Recursion.
_____________________________________________

Truth is want. - The internal state of matters.

Truth is Need. - The external state of affairs.
Lord Henry
Initiate

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Oct 24, 2009

Total Topics: 1
Total Posts: 7
Posted 10/24/09 - 04:10 PM:
quote post
#13
How can you be accused of pondering on a forum where you have as much time to think of a response as you wish. In this case, everyone on this forum is guilty of pondering.

Also, if you do not ponder a situation, you blurt out nonsensical babel. Philosophy is a subject that should always be pondered.
Arkady
Assistant Professor
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Jul 29, 2009

Total Topics: 16
Total Posts: 458
Posted 10/24/09 - 04:25 PM:
quote post
#14
Samuel Locke wrote:
Math for the most part is quite logical. One thing I fail to understand is how negative numbers fit with this sentiment. Zero is considered the epitome of nothing. So how can there be less than nothing?

Numbers needn't always describe physical quantities. You're correct that saying "I have -3 apples in my bag" is nonsensical, but it doesn't follow that the very notion of -3 is nonsensical.

"Sit down before fact like a little child, and be prepared to give up every preconceived notion. Follow humbly wherever and to whatever abyss Nature leads, or you shall learn nothing."
-T.H. Huxley
ragus
Tenured Poster
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Apr 23, 2006

Total Topics: 16
Total Posts: 2187
Posted 10/25/09 - 05:19 AM:
quote post
#15
Lord Henry, pondering is eliminated by the requirement of doing away with zero (as suggested by Banno who is known to be philosophically provocative). The elimination renders pondering on zero unnecessary but not pondering in general. Feel free to ponder and respond (an anagram btw of ponder by the addition of the letter s) as you see fit.

"A word in your ear is like an untethered goat in a field" Wittigenstein
ragus
Tenured Poster
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Apr 23, 2006

Total Topics: 16
Total Posts: 2187
Posted 10/25/09 - 05:26 AM:
quote post
#16
Arkady wrote

You're correct that saying "I have -3 apples in my bag" is nonsensical


If I sneak 3 apples from your bag of apples would you be talking nonsense if you claimed that you were missing 3 apples?

"A word in your ear is like an untethered goat in a field" Wittigenstein
Arkady
Assistant Professor
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Jul 29, 2009

Total Topics: 16
Total Posts: 458
Posted 10/25/09 - 07:13 AM:
quote post
#17
ragus wrote:
If I sneak 3 apples from your bag of apples would you be talking nonsense if you claimed that you were missing 3 apples?

Missing 3 apples wouldn't mean I have negative 3 apples, it would mean I had 0 apples. confused

"Sit down before fact like a little child, and be prepared to give up every preconceived notion. Follow humbly wherever and to whatever abyss Nature leads, or you shall learn nothing."
-T.H. Huxley
throng
Profester.
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Aug 12, 2008
Location: Downunder.

Total Topics: 43
Total Posts: 805
Posted 10/25/09 - 08:15 AM:
quote post
#18
If there were no zero on the numeric scale.... The scale would start somewhere and just keep going.

Such as Roman numerals, there'd be no negative numbers, but the figure 'I' would be positive in the number VI and negative in the number IV.

I know that I don't know, so I don't know if I do.
ragus
Tenured Poster
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Apr 23, 2006

Total Topics: 16
Total Posts: 2187
Posted 10/25/09 - 08:36 AM:
quote post
#19
Arkady wrote

Missing 3 apples wouldn't mean I have negative 3 apples, it would mean I had 0 apples.


So you can have 0 apples in your bag but not -3 apples. This sounds like discrimination against the negative.

You would have 0 apples left in your bag only if you had no more than 3 apples in your bag before I took them.

But you would be down 3 apples, wouldn't you? What if I left a note saying "I owe you 3 apples"? Would you claim that to be meaningless? What if I left a note saying "You owed me 3 apples"?

"A word in your ear is like an untethered goat in a field" Wittigenstein
Arkady
Assistant Professor
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Jul 29, 2009

Total Topics: 16
Total Posts: 458
Posted 10/25/09 - 08:46 AM:
quote post
#20
ragus wrote:
So you can have 0 apples in your bag but not -3 apples.

Yup.

ragus wrote:
This sounds like discrimination against the negative.

Perhaps a new Supreme Court case is on the horizon? sticking out tongue

ragus wrote:
You would have 0 apples left in your bag only if you had no more than 3 apples in your bag before I took them.

The only condition for having 0 apples in my bag is not having any apples in my bag.

ragus wrote:
But you would be down 3 apples, wouldn't you?

Yes, but that point is irrelevant. I have zero apples regardless of how I came to be divested of them

ragus wrote:
What if I left a note saying "I owe you 3 apples"? Would you claim that to be meaningless? What if I left a note saying "You owed me 3 apples"?

Again, irrelevant. A promissory note of having apples isn't an actual quantity.

"Sit down before fact like a little child, and be prepared to give up every preconceived notion. Follow humbly wherever and to whatever abyss Nature leads, or you shall learn nothing."
-T.H. Huxley
Download thread as

Page: 1 2 3



Sorry, you don't have permission to post. Log in, or register if you haven't yet.