Philosophy Forums
Style:


Please note: because you're not logged in, you may be viewing older cached versions of pages which are served up to reduce server load.

Debate Topics, Challenges and Scheduling

PrintPrint


Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Last

Debate Topics, Challenges and Scheduling
ThusSpokeZarathustra
banned

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Location: University of Missouri-Columbia

Total Topics: 26
Total Posts: 1049
quote post #101
Posted Aug 11, 2004 - 9:16 PM:

Are we going to have collective team posts, or each person post there own?
Socrastein
Looking to understand
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Jan 28, 2004
Location: A desolate sea of bollocks

Total Topics: 44
Total Posts: 2181
quote post #102
Posted Aug 13, 2004 - 3:58 AM:

I say collective team posts. That's the only way to ensure that this is actually a team effort, and not simply 2 people arguing the same position with no collaboration.
"The time has come for people of reason to say enough is enough. Religious faith discourages independent thought, it's devisive, and it's dangerous."
-Richard Dawkins
flatliner
banned

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Apr 07, 2004
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia

Total Topics: 44
Total Posts: 1766
quote post #103
Posted Aug 13, 2004 - 5:57 PM:

that sounds complicated.
What is this, a school for ants?!
http://www.specialdefects.com/v1/embed/heart_preloader.html
roobarb
Professor
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Dec 28, 2003
Location: Australia

Total Topics: 19
Total Posts: 711
quote post #104
Posted Aug 14, 2004 - 1:59 AM:

flatliner wrote:
that sounds complicated.


It does but its probably the best way to ensure a fair group debate.
I'm thinking something like each person has to send their post to the other member for edit and then post. And possibly allow more time between posts.
Robert
Guy who is keen to get started
Interlocutor
Professor

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Oct 23, 2002

Total Topics: 41
Total Posts: 879
quote post #105
Posted Aug 15, 2004 - 3:26 PM:

This is what I suggest. Each team should post collaborative posts. There should be no delineations between arguments of each individual, so that each teammate is accountable for each word written.

Other than that, I don't know of any ways in which the debate would differ from the one on one debates.
ThusSpokeZarathustra
banned

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Location: University of Missouri-Columbia

Total Topics: 26
Total Posts: 1049
quote post #106
Posted Aug 15, 2004 - 6:39 PM:

Topic: "Democracy is the ideal form of government"

Socrastein/Jay v. TSZ/Roobarb
Postivie .............. Negative

Collective posts done in standard form.

Is there anything else we need to decide, or can we go ahead and get this started?
Socrastein
Looking to understand
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Jan 28, 2004
Location: A desolate sea of bollocks

Total Topics: 44
Total Posts: 2181
quote post #107
Posted Aug 15, 2004 - 8:04 PM:

Sounds good to me.
"The time has come for people of reason to say enough is enough. Religious faith discourages independent thought, it's devisive, and it's dangerous."
-Richard Dawkins
ThusSpokeZarathustra
banned

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Location: University of Missouri-Columbia

Total Topics: 26
Total Posts: 1049
quote post #108
Posted Aug 15, 2004 - 8:07 PM:

ThusSpokeZarathustra wrote:
Topic: "Democracy is the ideal form of government"

Socrastein/Jay v. TSZ/Roobarb
Postivie .............. Negative

Collective posts done in standard form.

Is there anything else we need to decide, or can we go ahead and get this started?



Oh yeah, is it going to be voted. I vote for yes grin
Socrastein
Looking to understand
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Jan 28, 2004
Location: A desolate sea of bollocks

Total Topics: 44
Total Posts: 2181
quote post #109
Posted Aug 15, 2004 - 8:12 PM:

If Jay and Roob want it, that's fine. But I don't.
"The time has come for people of reason to say enough is enough. Religious faith discourages independent thought, it's devisive, and it's dangerous."
-Richard Dawkins
flatliner
banned

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Apr 07, 2004
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia

Total Topics: 44
Total Posts: 1766
quote post #110
Posted Aug 15, 2004 - 8:58 PM:

I say no vote because one team may end up losing because uninformed people end up doing the majority of the voting. Kind of like in the US. I'd rather just present arguments about who I think won.
What is this, a school for ants?!
http://www.specialdefects.com/v1/embed/heart_preloader.html
 
  • 100/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Download thread as

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Last



Bookmark and Share


Sorry, you don't have permission to post. Log in, or register if you haven't yet.