Antinatalism is best natalism

Antinatalism is best natalism

MeowMix
Unmoderated Member

Usergroup: Unmoderated Member
Joined: Feb 16, 2012

Total Topics: 80
Total Posts: 757
#1 - Quote - Permalink
1 of 6 people found this post helpful
Posted Mar 6, 2013 - 1:36 AM:
Subject: Antinatalism is best natalism

>have a child

child is pretty much guaranteed to experience suffering

>don't have a child

no child exists to be deprived of the good things in life

Blaise St Mary
Raised by Dragons
Avatar

Usergroup: Sponsors
Joined: Nov 24, 2012
Location: The Grandiose A-OmniLocus

Total Topics: 29
Total Posts: 2563
#2 - Quote - Permalink
Posted Mar 6, 2013 - 2:07 AM:

The issue centers on a interpretation of death and the afterlife. If you take death to be complete annihilation, then any memory of suffering is snuffed out with consciousness. The child may as well never have suffered in the slightest, as the least trace of its suffering is extinguished.

If you accept the possibility of an afterlife, daunting complications arise.

As an agnostic vis-a-vis any suggestion of an afterlife, you may, for the sake of symmetry, need to concede agnosticism vis-a-vis the problem of natalism.

Edited by Blaise St Mary on Mar 6, 2013 - 2:33 AM
unenlightened
How many cows? 0, 1, 2?
Avatar

Usergroup: Administrators
Joined: Aug 10, 2007
Location: Wales

Total Topics: 90
Total Posts: 12526
#3 - Quote - Permalink
5 of 5 people found this post helpful
Posted Mar 6, 2013 - 2:20 AM:

It's not all about pleasure and suffering.
dex
Forum Veteran
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Jan 05, 2011

Total Topics: 60
Total Posts: 605
#4 - Quote - Permalink
1 of 1 people found this post helpful
Posted Mar 6, 2013 - 2:29 AM:

Also, why have your own child when you could adopt one from the orphanage? Good for a kid who's already alive; good for keeping the population down; no hassle with being pregnant.
On Mar 11, 2013 - 1:53 AM, andrewk responded: What orphanage? We'd need a time machine to find one.
The Great Whatever
Πάντα ῥεῑ
Avatar

Usergroup: Sponsors
Joined: Sep 01, 2011

Total Topics: 73
Total Posts: 5943
#5 - Quote - Permalink
Posted Mar 6, 2013 - 3:37 AM:

Anti-natalism is intuitively appealing, and the world blows, but the justifications I've heard for it just don't work. It's usually founded on negative utilitarianism, which like its positive counterpart is highly suspect.
Philosofeeder
Earthling

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Apr 15, 2011
Location: The Burque

Total Topics: 6
Total Posts: 138
#6 - Quote - Permalink
1 of 2 people found this post helpful
Posted Mar 6, 2013 - 12:03 PM:

Love breeds love and the old die off.
MeowMix
Unmoderated Member

Usergroup: Unmoderated Member
Joined: Feb 16, 2012

Total Topics: 80
Total Posts: 757
#7 - Quote - Permalink
0 of 1 people found this post helpful
Posted Mar 11, 2013 - 12:30 AM:

The Great Whatever wrote:
Anti-natalism is intuitively appealing, and the world blows, but the justifications I've heard for it just don't work. It's usually founded on negative utilitarianism, which like its positive counterpart is highly suspect.

But why bother justifying it? I mean at the end of the day it is you who has to decide whether the justification is good enough or not, so why not just skip the middle man and say "having kids is bad because I say so". Probably just as likely (0%) to convince someone not to as spouting some dry boredom about asymmetry and utilitarianism. Neither is going to change a single thing.

Forced sterilization and abortions on the other hand....

Benkei
PF Addict

Usergroup: Sponsors
Joined: Feb 06, 2004

Total Topics: 173
Total Posts: 1287
#8 - Quote - Permalink
1 of 1 people found this post helpful
Posted Mar 11, 2013 - 3:38 AM:

MeowMix wrote:
But why bother justifying it?


Yes indeed. Why bother bringing this up (again) when you're not even going to make the effort to come up with a cogent argument?
On Mar 11, 2013 - 4:30 AM, baden511 responded: Agreed, let's not give birth to any more of these threads. Talk about needless suffering...
On Mar 11, 2013 - 5:12 AM, andrewk responded: I've moved it to casual, as it's not a serious attempt to discuss the topic.
locked
Download thread as
  • 20/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


Recent Internal Replies
On Mar 11, 2013 - 5:12 AM, andrewk replied internally to Benkei's Yes indeed. Why ....
On Mar 11, 2013 - 4:30 AM, baden511 replied internally to Benkei's Yes indeed. Why ....
On Mar 11, 2013 - 1:53 AM, andrewk replied internally to dex's Also, why have your ....

This thread is closed, so you cannot post a reply.

helper queue