Profile of muxol: Philosophy Forums

Forums Articles Gallery Links

Register Login Members Calendar New Posts Search Chat Help

Philosophy Forums » Member List » muxol

Profile of muxol

muxol

Contact Information

Guestbook: View or sign guestbook (0)

Biographical Information

Membership Status

Registration Date: Dec 07, 2003

Usergroup: Members

Topics Submitted: 1 topic

Total Posts: 1932 (1 per day)

Replies Received: 0

Shouts: 0

Total Time Online: 9 days, 21 hours and 25 minutes

Submission History

Most recent topics:

Post Reported: Illiteracy in Logic and Philosophy of Math
More primitive: restricted or unrestricted quantification?
Analytic and contingent statements
Tautologies and Validities
bug: editing and users browsing thread

Find all topics submitted by muxol

Most recent posts:

Agreed. I think the reason Joe Average finds the naive view so seductive is that it works flawlessly for finite sets. But this is just pointing out th...

No, it doesn't. Being a subset of a set X equinumerous with Y is not equivalent to being equinumerous with Y.

What is the puzzle? The case where X is a set of individuals with an empty family of relations (including functions) on X can be viewed as a speci...

One naive view concerning 'bigness' of sets is the following: x is bigger than y iff y is properly included in some isomorphic copy of x. Probably...

The difference is that one is intuitionistically and constructibly acceptable/coherent while the other is not. One can be (mentally, for the intui...

Find all posts posted by muxol