Philosophy Forums


Simulation Theory Ethics
Ethical implications should the theory find relative acceptance with the public.

PrintPrint


Simulation Theory Ethics
Janeoply
Initiate
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Oct 29, 2009
Location: Minnesota

Total Topics: 1
Total Posts: 2
Posted 10/29/09 - 01:40 PM:
Subject: Simulation Theory Ethics
quote post
#1
Greetings,

I obviously understand that Simulation Theory is widely rejected as being possible by nearly all philosophers, and further that the average citizen has not so much as even heard of it. In addition I am not promoting the theory though my imagination deems it as possible. However, if the theory could make the leap in the human imagination from impossible to probable, I ask what ethical implications would result within the individual. How would our moral attitudes change if the average person believed they existed in a four dimensional hologram created by others perhaps from the future.

Surely, the more basic minded within our civilization would mentally collapse, rejected all positive moral judgments, finding comfort in drugs, crime, and other negative societal influences. The wiser and more imaginative among us would perhaps find delight in knowing that their are higher intelligences than ourselves, resulting in an increase in spirituality (not necessarily religion), as well as a moral renaissance within the human race. Still others would no doubt degrade to a state of utter apathy, now knowing their entire existence was spent within an alien created false reality.

Whatever the potential attitudes of the public would comprise, surely no one can doubt that every individual on this beautiful sphere would have a personal transformation in relation to their philosophic actions in general, and their ethical ones specifically.

nothing can create nothing; except the Universe.
xzJoel
Bio-clump

Usergroup: Sponsors
Joined: Aug 30, 2005
Location: New Jersey

Total Topics: 32
Total Posts: 842
Posted 10/29/09 - 01:47 PM:
quote post
#2
Janeoply wrote:
Greetings,

I obviously understand that Simulation Theory is widely rejected as being possible by nearly all philosophers, and further that the average citizen has not so much as even heard of it. In addition I am not promoting the theory though my imagination deems it as possible. However, if the theory could make the leap in the human imagination from impossible to probable, I ask what ethical implications would result within the individual. How would our moral attitudes change if the average person believed they existed in a four dimensional hologram created by others perhaps from the future.

Surely, the more basic minded within our civilization would mentally collapse, rejected all positive moral judgments, finding comfort in drugs, crime, and other negative societal influences. The wiser and more imaginative among us would perhaps find delight in knowing that their are higher intelligences than ourselves, resulting in an increase in spirituality (not necessarily religion), as well as a moral renaissance within the human race. Still others would no doubt degrade to a state of utter apathy, now knowing their entire existence was spent within an alien created false reality.

Whatever the potential attitudes of the public would comprise, surely no one can doubt that every individual on this beautiful sphere would have a personal transformation in relation to their philosophic actions in general, and their ethical ones specifically.


That sounds pretty, but life as a fantasy isn't particularly new. There was the evil demon and his projections, DeCartes and his doubts, the Brain in a Vat, or any other number of problems. What doubting the "reality" of reality leads to is not a denial of ethics, but rather a serious critique of consequentialist type ethics. If we cannot know what our actions do, of what they cause to be, how can we be held responsible for them?

It is for this reason that I maintain that ethics applies no matter where you are or what you are doing and is based on actioned intention. If you are dreaming and you act to murder someone, you are ethically a murderer. When you wake up and decide that you were just dreaming, you may perhaps forgive yourself, but that doesn't change what you are.

There is no need for us to be "real" for us to have ethics nor is there a need for us to be "real" for us to have value. What is is and we have no control over that. What we can do is act within the world presented by the shadows on the wall as if it were the real world and do our best to make our home within it.


Make a joyous noise onto the lord... Not a good one, just a joyous one.
Kant Chocula
Aspirant
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Oct 28, 2009
Location: North East Ohio

Total Topics: 2
Total Posts: 29
Posted 10/30/09 - 06:22 AM:
quote post
#3
I don't think anything would change. When nihilism spread across the intellectual elite of Europe during the 19th century they did not devolve into a bunch of hedonistic monsters simply because nothing mattered anymore. Likewise, when the faithful lose their faith they generally do not go on a killing spree because no one exists to punish them. What I value as morally good is not contingent upon my belief of what the universe actually is. Helping old ladies across the street will still feel just as good regardless if we actually are real or not.

A categorically delicious part of your noumenal breakfast.
Download thread as


Sorry, you don't have permission to post. Log in, or register if you haven't yet.