Philosophy Forums


Einstein vs Kant

PrintPrint


Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Einstein vs Kant
180 Proof
kynic
Avatar

Usergroup: Sponsors
Joined: Apr 27, 2003
Location: NOTHINGlifeNOTHING

Total Topics: 84
Total Posts: 5120
Posted 08/30/09 - 03:26 PM:
quote post
#71
marmot wrote:
This is why it is difficult to imagine curved space, because under ordinary conversation, "curved space" has absolutely no sense.

It seems only as difficult as drawing a triangle on the surface of a basketball or saddle. rolling eyes

The question isn't "Which explanations do I believe?" but rather "Which explanations do I least disbelieve?"

Absence of evidence THAT MUST BE THERE (i.e. implied by any claim, concept, or (its) predicates, that affects changes in/to the world) entails evidence of absence.

[What cannot be done?[What cannot be hoped?[What cannot be known?]]]
marmot
Initiate

Usergroup: Members
Joined: May 31, 2009

Total Topics: 2
Total Posts: 17
0 of 1 people found this post helpful
Posted 08/30/09 - 04:44 PM:
quote post
#72
That is not what people mean when using "space" in ordinary conversations. What you are trying to visualize is a manifold, which is a mathematical structure.
ragus
Tenured Poster
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Apr 23, 2006

Total Topics: 16
Total Posts: 2187
Posted 08/30/09 - 10:31 PM:
quote post
#73
marmot wrote

That is not what people mean when using "space" in ordinary conversations.


In what ways do people talk about ordinary (common-sense?) space that are different from other ways of talking?

"A word in your ear is like an untethered goat in a field" Wittigenstein
cosscos
Graduate

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Dec 11, 2008

Total Topics: 3
Total Posts: 171
Posted 08/31/09 - 02:58 AM:
quote post
#74
People say that the singularity is spacetime in which space and time are infinite. Apart from faster than the speed of light, nothing wouldn't get out of it.

What I'd like to ask is, the singularty point is the thing in itself which kant talked about?





cc
marmot
Initiate

Usergroup: Members
Joined: May 31, 2009

Total Topics: 2
Total Posts: 17
Posted 08/31/09 - 11:28 AM:
quote post
#75
ragus wrote:
marmot wrote



In what ways do people talk about ordinary (common-sense?) space that are different from other ways of talking?


Several ways. To a mathematician space is axiomatic - something is a space if it follows certain axioms. Its a very specific and formal structure. You can have infinite dimentional spaces, you can also have two dimentional spaces, etc. Mathematicians call their spaces "space" because it might make a good analogy, but it is not the same as in

"the space between two houses"

"there is nothing, just space"

"I left space in the board"

To think that relativitys spacetime is "real" requires the reification of pretty abstruse mathematics. Its platonic through and through.

ragus
Tenured Poster
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Apr 23, 2006

Total Topics: 16
Total Posts: 2187
Posted 08/31/09 - 11:33 AM:
quote post
#76
marmot wrote

To think that relativitys spacetime is "real" requires the reification of pretty abstruse mathematics.


OK. I know what you're saying but then what is "real" space?

"A word in your ear is like an untethered goat in a field" Wittigenstein
marmot
Initiate

Usergroup: Members
Joined: May 31, 2009

Total Topics: 2
Total Posts: 17
0 of 1 people found this post helpful
Posted 09/01/09 - 11:33 PM:
quote post
#77
ragus wrote:
marmot wrote



OK. I know what you're saying but then what is "real" space?


That is the error here. Asking "what is space" lacks sense. Just look at the way people use the word "space". It certainly has very little to do with mathematical manifolds and geodesics.
Kwalish Kid
Tenured Poster
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Sep 26, 2004

Total Topics: 33
Total Posts: 3844
1 of 1 people found this post helpful
Posted 09/02/09 - 03:45 AM:
quote post
#78
marmot wrote:
To think that relativitys spacetime is "real" requires the reification of pretty abstruse mathematics. Its platonic through and through.

That position seems hard to justify in the face of the actual power that spacetime has on the actual course of events that we can observe. The bending of light due to gravity, the expansion of the universe, the time dilation of radio signals bounced through the solar system, the difference between clocks in orbit and clocks on the ground, ... All these things are because of the influence of the stress-energy tensor describing the contents of spacetime on spacetime and the way that changes in spacetime dictate the course of events. The geometry of spacetime plays a real, measurable role.

"Scientific truth is always paradox, if judged by everyday experience, which catches only the delusive nature of things." - KM, V, P and P

Can you pass Religion 101?
ragus
Tenured Poster
Avatar

Usergroup: Members
Joined: Apr 23, 2006

Total Topics: 16
Total Posts: 2187
Posted 09/02/09 - 10:09 AM:
quote post
#79
marmot wrote

Asking "what is space" lacks sense.


I asked about "real" space because you claimed that some spaces aren't "real" but anyway why does asking "what is space" lack sense?

"A word in your ear is like an untethered goat in a field" Wittigenstein
Download thread as

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8



Sorry, you don't have permission to post. Log in, or register if you haven't yet.